BingX vs Bitget: fees compared
With the loweef rebate returning 60% of every fee, BingX’s effective futures taker rate is about 0.02% — below Bitget’s standard 0.06%. Bitget’s VIP tiers and discounts can narrow the gap (conditions apply); the tables below show the standard-tier numbers side by side.
loweef is not affiliated with Bitget. Rates shown are standard published rates as of 2026-08-04. Official fee schedule →
| BingX | Bitget | |
|---|---|---|
| Standard taker (futures) | 0.05% | 0.06% |
| Standard maker (futures) | 0.02% | 0.02% |
| Fee rebate via loweef | 60% | Not partnered |
| Effective taker after rebate | 0.02% | 0.06% |
- Paying fees with the exchange’s native token can lower these rates (opt-in, conditions apply).
- VIP / volume tiers reduce fees below the standard rate shown.
Monthly futures fees at real volumes: BingX vs Bitget
| Monthly volume | BingX effective cost | Bitget standard cost |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $10 | $30 |
| $500,000 | $100 | $300 |
| $5,000,000 | $1,000 | $3,000 |
Effective rate = standard taker fee minus the rebate share returned in USDT (accrues daily). Figures are estimates from published schedules; actual fees vary with VIP tier and maker/taker mix.
Get the BingX rebate → Bitget fee breakdown →
Frequently asked questions
Is BingX cheaper than Bitget for futures?
At standard tiers, yes on effective cost: BingX lands at about 0.02% taker after the loweef rebate vs Bitget’s 0.06% standard rate. Bitget VIP tiers or token discounts can lower its side — the comparison here uses standard published rates.
What can change these Bitget numbers?
VIP/volume tiers, token-based fee discounts and promotions can lower Bitget’s standard rates — check its official fee schedule for current conditions. The BingX side already reflects the rebate, which applies at every tier from the first trade.