BingX vs MEXC — which costs less to trade?
On effective futures cost today, MEXC comes out ahead: 0.0180% effective taker after its 55% loweef rebate, versus 0.0200% on BingX. Standard fees are close — the rebate rate is what separates them.
Fees and rebates, side by side
| Exchange | Taker fee (futures) | Maker fee (futures) | Total rate | Welcome boost | Effective taker |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BingX | 0.05% | 0.02% | 60% | 70% | 0.0200% |
| MEXC | 0.04% | 0.01% | 55% | 65% | 0.0180% |
What the gap is worth at your volume
| BingX | MEXC | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly volume | Fees/mo | Payback/mo | Effective cost/mo | Fees/mo | Payback/mo | Effective cost/mo |
| $50,000 | $25 | $15 | $10 | $20 | $11 | $9 |
| $500,000 | $250 | $150 | $100 | $200 | $110 | $90 |
| $5,000,000 | $2,500 | $1,500 | $1,000 | $2,000 | $1,100 | $900 |
Monthly figures at standard taker fees; payback = fees × total rate. Estimates only — actual results vary with VIP tier and maker/taker mix.
BingX rebate details → MEXC rebate details → Estimate my rebate
Frequently asked questions
Can I get the loweef rebate on both BingX and MEXC?
Yes. Link each exchange UID in the loweef dashboard — payback accrues daily in USDT from your trading on each exchange, and withdrawals are paid to an exchange UID you have linked.
Do these numbers change?
Rates are read from loweef live exchange data and re-verified regularly — last verified 2026-08-26. The leader can change when fees or rebate rates move.
Last checked: 2026-08-26