AlphaX vs BingX — which costs less to trade?
On effective futures cost today, AlphaX comes out ahead: 0.0175% effective taker after its 65% loweef rebate, versus 0.0200% on BingX. Standard fees are close — the rebate rate is what separates them.
Fees and rebates, side by side
| Exchange | Taker fee (futures) | Maker fee (futures) | Total rate | Welcome boost | Effective taker |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlphaX | 0.05% | 0.02% | 65% | — | 0.0175% |
| BingX | 0.05% | 0.02% | 60% | 70% | 0.0200% |
What the gap is worth at your volume
| AlphaX | BingX | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly volume | Fees/mo | Payback/mo | Effective cost/mo | Fees/mo | Payback/mo | Effective cost/mo |
| $50,000 | $25 | $16 | $9 | $25 | $15 | $10 |
| $500,000 | $250 | $163 | $88 | $250 | $150 | $100 |
| $5,000,000 | $2,500 | $1,625 | $875 | $2,500 | $1,500 | $1,000 |
Monthly figures at standard taker fees; payback = fees × total rate. Estimates only — actual results vary with VIP tier and maker/taker mix.
AlphaX rebate details → BingX rebate details → Estimate my rebate
Frequently asked questions
Can I get the loweef rebate on both AlphaX and BingX?
Yes. Rebates are set per exchange account — link each exchange UID in the loweef dashboard and each accrues independently to its own per-exchange balance, daily in USDT.
Do these numbers change?
Rates are read from loweef live exchange data and re-verified regularly — last verified 2026-08-03. The leader can change when fees or rebate rates move.
Last checked: 2026-08-03