Bybit vs Bitget: fees compared

With the loweef rebate returning 37% of every fee, Bybit’s effective futures taker rate is about 0.0347% — below Bitget’s standard 0.06%. Bitget’s VIP tiers and discounts can narrow the gap (conditions apply); the tables below show the standard-tier numbers side by side.

loweef is not affiliated with Bitget. Rates shown are standard published rates as of 2026-10-12. Official fee schedule →

Bybit vs Bitget: fees compared
BybitBitget
Standard taker (futures)0.055%0.06%
Standard maker (futures)0.02%0.02%
Fee rebate via loweef37%Not partnered
Effective taker after rebate0.0347%0.06%
  • Paying fees with the exchange’s native token can lower these rates (opt-in, conditions apply).
  • VIP / volume tiers reduce fees below the standard rate shown.

Monthly futures fees at real volumes: Bybit vs Bitget

Monthly futures fees at real volumes: Bybit vs Bitget
Monthly volumeBybit effective costBitget standard cost
$50,000$17$30
$500,000$173$300
$5,000,000$1,733$3,000

Effective rate = standard taker fee minus the rebate share returned in USDT (accrues daily). Figures are estimates from published schedules; actual fees vary with VIP tier and maker/taker mix.

Get the Bybit rebate → Bitget fee breakdown →

Frequently asked questions

Is Bybit cheaper than Bitget for futures?

At standard tiers, yes on effective cost: Bybit lands at about 0.0347% taker after the loweef rebate vs Bitget’s 0.06% standard rate. Bitget VIP tiers or token discounts can lower its side — the comparison here uses standard published rates.

What can change these Bitget numbers against Bybit?

VIP/volume tiers, token-based fee discounts and promotions can lower Bitget’s standard rates — check its official fee schedule for current conditions. The Bybit side already reflects the rebate, which applies at every tier from the first trade.

Related questions

Compare Bybit: BingX vs Bybit · OKX vs Bybit · MEXC vs Bybit